Nothing is resolved, because nobody fixed anything
The obvious way to build this is the wrong one. If turning a check off closed its findings, every one of them would land in Proof as a change somebody made — thousands of receipts for work that never happened. And if the findings were simply left open, they would sit on the list forever, asking for work no check will ever look at again.
So a finding whose check goes off does neither. It goes quiet: a state of its own that keeps the evidence, the revision and the history, and credits nobody. It leaves the open counts, the lanes, Today and the alerts, and it never appears in Proof.
Choose requirements for this store
The full-description minimum, requiring an assigned brand, and requiring that brand in the title are off by default. Enable them in Checks for the selected store. A minimum needs a positive character count; the same value is used in scanning and draft review. Changing the number shows its expected impact before saving and starts a full scan.
Work already in progress gets a recorded outcome
A change already sent to the store still needs its result checked. A proposal waiting to be sent is checked against the current policy first. Changing a rule can make that proposal stale; it never authorizes a different catalog value. Completed writes retain their receipts, while a rule change alone counts no repair.
Nothing new of a turned-off check is written down in the meantime.
Turning it back on does not un-do anything
Restoring quiet findings wholesale would be a lie. Some of their products no longer exist; some were fixed while nobody was watching. So turning a check back on restores nothing directly — it starts a full catalog check, and that decides:
- Still there — the finding is open again, the same case with the same history, in the same revision unless the product itself moved.
- Gone — the finding closes crediting nobody. It is not counted as a fix, and Proof does not report one.
A dismissal is a different thing, and it survives
Turning a check off is a rule about the whole store. Dismissing one finding is a person saying this particular product does not have this problem. The two never overrule each other: a finding you dismissed stays dismissed through a check going off and coming back, and only a change to the product itself brings it up again.
What it costs, before you decide
Saving the list is one decision: however many switches you moved, they arrive together, leave one receipt with your name and the door you came through, and start one catalog check rather than one per switch. Before you save, the confirmation counts what it will move — how many findings go quiet, across how many checks, how many drafts go with them, and how many cases are already on their way to your store and will be seen through regardless.